w3resource

Python: Find the digits which are absent in a given mobile number

Python Basic - 1: Exercise-25 with Solution

Write a Python program to find the digits which are absent in a given mobile number.

Sample Solution:

Python Code:

def absent_digits(n):
  all_nums = set([0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9])
  n = set([int(i) for i in n])
  n = n.symmetric_difference(all_nums)
  n = sorted(n)
  return n
print(absent_digits([9,8,3,2,2,0,9,7,6,3]))

Sample Output:

[1, 4, 5]

Pictorial Presentation:

Python: Find the digits which are absent in a given mobile number

Flowchart:

Flowchart: Python - Find the digits which are absent in a given mobile number

Visualize Python code execution:

The following tool visualize what the computer is doing step-by-step as it executes the said program:

Python Code Editor:

Have another way to solve this solution? Contribute your code (and comments) through Disqus.

Previous:Write a Python program to find the number of divisors of a given integer is even or odd.
Next: Write a Python program to compute the summation of the absolute difference of all distinct pairs in an given array (non-decreasing order).

What is the difficulty level of this exercise?

Test your Programming skills with w3resource's quiz.



Python: Tips of the Day

Iterating over dictionaries using 'for' loops:

I am a bit puzzled by the following code: d = {'x': 1, 'y': 2, 'z': 3} for key in d: print key, 'corresponds to', d[key] What I don't understand is the key portion. How does Python recognize ...

key is just a variable name.

for key in d:

For Python 3.x:

for key, value in d.items():

For Python 2.x:

for key, value in d.iteritems():

To test for yourself, change the word key to poop.

In Python 3.x, iteritems() was replaced with simply items(), which returns a set-like view backed by the dict, like iteritems() but even better. This is also available in 2.7 as viewitems().

The operation items() will work for both 2 and 3, but in 2 it will return a list of the dictionary's (key, value) pairs, which will not reflect changes to the dict that happen after the items() call. If you want the 2.x behavior in 3.x, you can call list(d.items()).

Ref: https://bit.ly/37dm0Qo