w3resource

JavaScript: Apply a function against an accumulator and each element in the array (from left to right), returning an array of successively reduced values

JavaScript: Exercise-156 with Solution

Write a JavaScript program to apply a function against an accumulator and each element in the array (from left to right), returning an array of successively reduced values.

  • Use Array.prototype.reduce() to apply the given function to the given array, storing each new result.

Sample Solution:

JavaScript Code:

//#Source https://bit.ly/2neWfJ2 
const reduceSuccessive = (arr, fn, acc) =>
  arr.reduce((res, val, i, arr) => (res.push(fn(res.slice(-1)[0], val, i, arr)), res), [acc]);

console.log(reduceSuccessive([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6], (acc, val) => acc + val, 0));

Sample Output:

[0,1,3,6,10,15,21]

Flowchart:

flowchart: Apply a function against an accumulator and each element in the array (from left to right), returning an array of successively reduced values

Live Demo:

See the Pen javascript-basic-exercise-156-1 by w3resource (@w3resource) on CodePen.


Improve this sample solution and post your code through Disqus

Previous: Write a JavaScript program that takes a predicate and array, like Array.filter(), but only keeps x if pred(x) returns false.
Next: Write a JavaScript program to redirect to a specified URL.

What is the difficulty level of this exercise?

Test your Programming skills with w3resource's quiz.



JavaScript: Tips of the Day

Checking if a key exists in a JavaScript object?

Checking for undefined-ness is not an accurate way of testing whether a key exists. What if the key exists but the value is actually undefined?

var obj = { key: undefined };
obj["key"] !== undefined // false, but the key exists!

You should instead use the in operator:

"key" in obj // true, regardless of the actual value

If you want to check if a key doesn't exist, remember to use parenthesis:

!("key" in obj) // true if "key" doesn't exist in object
!"key" in obj   // ERROR!  Equivalent to "false in obj"

Or, if you want to particularly test for properties of the object instance (and not inherited properties), use hasOwnProperty:

obj.hasOwnProperty("key") // true

Checking for undefined-ness is not an accurate way of testing whether a key exists. What if the key exists but the value is actually undefined? var obj = { key: undefined }; obj["key"] !== undefined // false, but the key exists! You should instead use the in operator: "key" in obj // true, regardless of the actual value If you want to check if a key doesn't exist, remember to use parenthesis: !("key" in obj) // true if "key" doesn't exist in object !"key" in obj // ERROR! Equivalent to "false in obj" Or, if you want to particularly test for properties of the object instance (and not inherited properties), use hasOwnProperty: obj.hasOwnProperty("key") // true For performance comparison between the methods that are in, hasOwnProperty and key is undefined.

Ref: https://bit.ly/2CFNp1X