w3resource

Python: Sum of all items of a given array of integers where each integer is multiplied by its index

Python Basic - 1: Exercise-100 with Solution

Write a Python program to compute the sum of all items of a given array of integers where each integer is multiplied by its index. Return 0 if there is no number.

Sample Solution:

Python Code:

def sum_index_multiplier(nums):
	return sum(j*i for i, j in enumerate(nums))

print(sum_index_multiplier([1,2,3,4]))
print(sum_index_multiplier([-1,-2,-3,-4]))
print(sum_index_multiplier([]))

Sample Output:

20
-20
0

Pictorial Presentation:

Python: Sum of all items of a given array of integers where each integer is multiplied by its index.

Flowchart:

Flowchart: Python - Sum of all items of a given array of integers where each integer is multiplied by its index.

Python Code Editor:

Have another way to solve this solution? Contribute your code (and comments) through Disqus.

Previous: Write a Python program to find the position of the second occurrence of a given string in another given string.
Next: Write a Python program to find the name of the oldest student from a given dictionary containing the names and ages of a group of students.

What is the difficulty level of this exercise?

Test your Programming skills with w3resource's quiz.



Python: Tips of the Day

Iterating over dictionaries using 'for' loops:

I am a bit puzzled by the following code: d = {'x': 1, 'y': 2, 'z': 3} for key in d: print key, 'corresponds to', d[key] What I don't understand is the key portion. How does Python recognize ...

key is just a variable name.

for key in d:

For Python 3.x:

for key, value in d.items():

For Python 2.x:

for key, value in d.iteritems():

To test for yourself, change the word key to poop.

In Python 3.x, iteritems() was replaced with simply items(), which returns a set-like view backed by the dict, like iteritems() but even better. This is also available in 2.7 as viewitems().

The operation items() will work for both 2 and 3, but in 2 it will return a list of the dictionary's (key, value) pairs, which will not reflect changes to the dict that happen after the items() call. If you want the 2.x behavior in 3.x, you can call list(d.items()).

Ref: https://bit.ly/37dm0Qo